<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>benchmark on vNinja.net | VMware, VCF &amp; Homelab</title><link>https://vninja.net/tags/benchmark/</link><description>Recent content in benchmark on vNinja.net | VMware, VCF &amp; Homelab</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;copy; 2010 - 2026 &lt;b&gt;vNinja.net&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;em&gt;There is a thin line between agile and fragile&lt;/em&gt;</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:30:43 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vninja.net/tags/benchmark/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Revisiting the Ceph-Over-Thunderbolt Numbers</title><link>https://vninja.net/2026/08/10/revisiting-the-ceph-over-thunderbolt-numbers/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://vninja.net/2026/08/10/revisiting-the-ceph-over-thunderbolt-numbers/</guid><description>Re-benchmarking the three-node Ceph-over-Thunderbolt cluster under real production load, days after the original build, and asking whether the numbers hold up or were just good for a novelty setup.</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://vninja.net/2026/08/10/revisiting-the-ceph-over-thunderbolt-numbers/featured.png"/></item></channel></rss>